Systems and methods for secure online credential authentication

ABSTRACT

Systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable medium are disclosed includes for secure online credential authentication. One method includes receiving, over an electronic network, identification information from an identity provider; accessing, from a database, previously stored hashed identification information stored in association with a previous identity provider; comparing the identification information to previously stored hashed identification information; and storing the identification information in association with the identity provider that provided the identification information in the database when the hashed identification information does not match previously stored hashed identification information.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 62/241,880, filed Oct. 15, 2015, the entire contents ofwhich is herein incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Various embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to secureonline credential authentication.

BACKGROUND

Authentication of a user's identity and/or credentials in a networkedenvironment requires the ability to associate a user and/or credentialwith an online identity, such as a username and/or email address.Assurance levels (“ALs”) relate to a degree of confidence that a claimedidentity is related to an online identity. Additionally, ALs relate thedegree of confidence that a claimed credential is associated with theonline identity. Assurance levels have been defined in a number ofdocuments by standards bodies, including the U.S. Office of Managementand Budget (“OMB”), International Organization for Standardization(“ISO”), National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”),Federal Identity, Credential, and Access Management (“FICAM”), theKantara Initiative, etc., such as OMB M-04-04, NIST 800-63-2, etc.

Parties seeking authentication of an online identity and/or a credentialof an online identity may require a certain AL before conducting anonline or offline transaction with the user being authenticated. Thelevel of assurance (AL) or trust the party requires may be necessary tomitigate risk in their transactions, especially in matters of financeand national security.

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for providing aremotely verified authentication of online identities and credentials torelying parties, which can be trusted by the relying parties consistentwith the determined or requested assurance level.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems, methods, andnon-transitory computer-readable media for online authentication ofonline attributes.

According to embodiments of the present disclosure, acomputer-implemented method for secure online credential authenticationis disclosed. One method includes receiving, at a server over anelectronic network, identification information from an identityprovider; accessing, by the server from a database, previously storedhashed identification information stored in association with a previousidentity provider; comparing, by the server, the identificationinformation to previously stored hashed identification information; andstoring, by the server, the identification information in associationwith the identity provider that provided the identification informationin the database when the hashed identification information does notmatch previously stored hashed identification information.

According to embodiments of the present disclosure, a system for secureonline credential authentication is disclosed. One system includes adata storage device that stores instructions system for secure onlinecredential authentication; and a processor configured to execute theinstructions to perform a method including: receiving, over anelectronic network, identification information from an identityprovider; accessing, from a database, previously stored hashedidentification information stored in association with a previousidentity provider; comparing the identification information topreviously stored hashed identification information; and storing theidentification information in association with the identity providerthat provided the identification information in the database when thehashed identification information does not match previously storedhashed identification information.

According to embodiments of the present disclosure, a non-transitorycomputer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by acomputer, cause the computer to perform a method for secure onlinecredential authentication is disclosed. The method of the non-transitorycomputer-readable medium including: receiving, over an electronicnetwork, identification information from an identity provider;accessing, from a database, previously stored hashed identificationinformation stored in association with a previous identity provider;comparing the identification information to previously stored hashedidentification information; and storing the identification informationin association with the identity provider that provided theidentification information in the database when the hashedidentification information does not match previously stored hashedidentification information.

Additional objects and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will beset forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will beapparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of thedisclosed embodiments. The objects and advantages of the disclosedembodiments will be realized and attained by means of the elements andcombinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description andthe following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory onlyand are not restrictive of the scope of disclosed embodiments, as setforth by the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of this specification, illustrate various exemplary embodimentsand, together with the description, serve to explain the principles ofthe disclosed embodiments.

FIG. 1 depicts a networked environment for online authentication of auser utilizing a credential broker, according to an embodiment of thepresent disclosure;

FIG. 2 depicts a flow diagram providing a method in which onlineidentities and/or credentials may be authenticated through a credentialbroker, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 depicts a flow diagram 300 providing a method for secure onlinecredential authentication, according to one embodiment of the presentdisclosure; and

FIG. 4 depicts a simplified functional block diagram of a computer thatmay be configured as a system, device, module, or server for executingthe methods describe in conjunction with the figures above, according toexemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments of thedisclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanyingdrawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be usedthroughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.

An identity provider, also referred to as a credential service provider,may provide authentication services in order to verify an onlineidentity and/or one or more credentials of a user (real person) in anetworked environment. The identity provider, in verifying an onlineidentity and/or a credential of a user, may associate the user with anonline identity, such as a username, and the one or more credentialswith the online identity. When verifying (authenticating) onlineidentities and/or credentials, an assurance level (“AL”), which relatesto a degree of confidence that an online identity and/or a credentialare associated with the user are accurate, may be determined throughvarious procedures. Online identities, credentials, and associated ALsmay all be stored by an identity provider to serve future authenticationrequests and/or to preserve histories of changes related to a user.Examples of identity providers that rely on low assurance levels mayinclude ID.me, Facebook Connect, Google, and LinkedIn. Examples ofidentity providers that rely on high assurance levels may include ID.me,Symantec, Verizon, and bank logins.

A relying party (“RP”) may be one or more of an organization, abusiness, and/or an individual that seek authentication of a user. RPsmay provide user related data to the identity provider to requestauthentication of a new and/or unidentified online identity, to requestauthentication of the credentials of a user, and/or to seekre-authentication of an online identity and/or credential of a user.Additionally, and/or alternatively, a user (real person) may provideuser-related data to the identity provider to authenticate themselveswith an online identity and/or to authenticate a credential.

A credential broker may allow a plurality of identity providers(credential service providers) to integrate their authenticationservices with multiple relying parties. A credential broker may alsoallow a plurality of relying parties that wish to authenticate an onlineidentity and/or one or more credentials of a user (real person) in anetworked environment to integrate a single entity, the credentialbroker, rather than a plurality of identity providers (credentialservice providers). In one embodiment of the present disclosure, acredential broker and an identity provider may be a single entity.

In order to authenticate a user's online identity and/or credential, theidentity provider may access various verification data sources. Theseverification data sources may provide various trustworthy data relatedto the user for the authentication party. For example, verification datasources may include, but are not limited to, federal agencies, financialinstitutions, membership organizations, credit bureaus, nationalarchives, etc.

The identity provider may maintain an internal directory of users in anidentity core database. The identity core database may be unpublishedand/or inaccessible to third-parties. The identity core database may beused by the identity party to provide authentication services and/orprovide ALs via various online data formats and protocols, such as aSecurity Assertion Markup Language (“SAML”), OAuth, OpenID, etc. Theprocess of populating the identity core database may occur in responseto a RP seeking authentication of an online identity and/or credential.The identity provider may create and/or implement a pre-definedprocedure for a particular RP in order to automatically obtain therequested authentications and/or ALs. The procedures defined for an RPmay instruct the identity provider which verification data sources toaccess in order to provide an authentication and/or a requested AL.

A credential broker, for a transaction to be authenticated, may receiveidentification information from an identity provider. Alternatively, thecredential broker, for the transaction to be authenticated, may receiveidentification information directly from a user and/or a third-party.The identification information may include one or more of a first name,last name, full name, date of birth, social security number, address,and/or other information related to the user. In one embodiment, if theidentity provider and the credential broker are the same entity, thecredential broker may receive login information and lookupidentification information stored in, for example, the identity coredatabase. In another embodiment, if the identity provider and thecredential broker are different entities, the credential broker mayreceive the identification information from a requester.

Upon receiving and/or retrieving, the identification information, thecredential broker may then hash the identification information. Afterthe credential broker hashes the identification information, thecredential broker may remove and/or delete the identificationinformation. In alternative embodiment, the credential broker, for atransaction to be authenticated, may receive a predetermined hash of theidentification information. The predetermined hash may be hashedidentification information provided by a requestor. The predeterminedhash may be a hash of identification information that the credentialprovider and the requestor have previously determined to be used for thepredetermined hash.

The credential broker may then compare the hashed identificationinformation with previously stored hashed identification information ina hash database of the credential broker. If the hashed identificationinformation does not match any previously stored hashed identificationinformation, the credential broker may store the hashed identificationinformation and the identity provider transmitting the identificationinformation in the hash database. The credential broker may thentransmit an authentication result to a relying party.

If the hashed identification information matches a previously storedhashed identification information, the credential broker may compare theidentity provider that sent the identification information to a previousidentity provider stored in association with the previously storedhashed identification information. If the current identity providermatches the previous identity provider, then the credential broker maythen transmit an authentication result to the RP.

If the hashed identification information matches a previously storedhashed identification information and the current identity provider doesnot match the previous identity provider, then the user may authenticatetheir identity with the previous identity provider. Alternatively, ifthe hashed identification information matches a previously stored hashedidentification information and the current identity provider does notmatch the previous identity provider, then the user may be notified toauthenticate their identity with the previous identity provider.

In one embodiment of the present disclosure, authentication requestsfrom one or more of the identity provider, credential broker, a RP,and/or a user may be encrypted and/or signed. Additionally, and/oralternatively, any communications between the identity provider, RP,credential broker, verification data sources, and/or users may beencrypted and/or signed using various cryptology methods, including SSLand/or SOAP.

Users that are being authenticated by a relying party may authorize theidentity provider to access the verification data sources prior toauthentication and/or prior to the authentication being presented to theRP.

The systems and methods described herein may provide a secure way ofauthenticating a user while also providing privacy for the user. Abenefit of the present disclosure is that a credential broker does notmaintain any personal identification information of the user while beingable to authenticate the user based on non-personally identifiablehashed information. Further, if a user's personal identificationinformation is stolen and if their secure login information iscompromised, the user's online credentials may remain secure through theuser of the credential broker.

For example, if the user's person identification information is stolen,an identity thief may use the user's stolen name, date of birth,address, and/or social security number to attempt to open a new account.When the identify thief attempts to login with a new identity providerthat utilizes a credential broker as described herein, the identitythief may be requested to provide login information of a separate,previously stored identity provider if the user has previously used thecredential broker. In this example, an identity thief may be inpossession of static personally information of the user, but theidentity thief may not know how to authenticate that identity via apreviously registered user. If the legitimate user has not previouslyused the credential broker, the user may be notified of the identitytheft (when attempting to register with the credential broker) becausethe legitimate user will not be able to log into an account that usesthe credential broker. The legitimate user may then be able to assertcontrol over their online identity through their legitimate credentialsand prevent further fraud. In another example, one or more of anorganization, business, and/or relying party may suffer from fraud,hacking, or theft, and may notify the credential broker and/or users.Then, the credential broker may revoke credentials that have beencompromised, and may notify users of compromised credentials to restorecontrol and registration of new credentials.

As discussed above and below, a benefit of the present disclosure isthat it may allow for identity proofing. In particular, the presentdisclosure may allow for an individual to be validated and/or one ormore attributes of an individual, such as first name, last name, socialsecurity number, date of birth, and/or address, to be validated.Accordingly, the present disclosure may allow for the individual to bevalidated upon validation of the one or more attributes. For example, anindividual may be validated upon confirming that the individual's nameis John Smith with a date of birth of Jun. 10, 1985, and a home and/ormailing address of 123 King Street, Alexandria, Va. 22222. Further, thepresent disclosure may include the ability to use the one or moreattributes to resolve to an individual to a single, unique identity. Forexample, a social security number (“SSN”) may be used by a bank toresolve multiple John Smiths with the same date of birth to a particularindividual. Upon resolving the individual to the single, uniqueidentity, a digital credential may be issued to the individual. Thedigital credential, along with the one or more attributes and/or otherinformation, may then be used to determine whether an individual havingthe digital credential is the legitimate individual or an identitythief.

One exemplary use of the present disclosure may be in voting. Anon-personally identifiable, unique identifier may be assigned to avoter. The non-personally identifiable, unique identifier may be hashedand published to a block chain and/or a database after the particularidentity (person) votes in the election. When combined with identityproofing at a high assurance level that meets federal standards and anability to establish voting age, citizenship, and uniqueness, then thecombination of the present disclosure with public records may recordthat a specific, unique legal identity of a voting age cast his/her votefor a particular candidate without revealing the actual identity of thevoter.

Another exemplary use of the present disclosure may be with FederalBureau of Investigation (“FBI”) background check results. Currently, theFBI allows citizens to request their own criminal background histories.The FBI also may send background check results to state and localgovernment agencies to determine whether a particular person may work ina regulated industry, such as at an airport, as an in-home caregiver, ataxi driver, an ambulance driver, etc. However, a citizen, who hasrequested their own criminal background history may not be able to sharetheir results with a third party directly without ensuring the resultshave not been manipulated. The problem with the citizen path is that achain of custody goes the FBI to the citizen to a third party. By use ofthe present disclosure, the FBI may publish the citizen's criminalbackground check results to a private block chain, and the citizen maycontrol delegated access to the results. The block chain may prevent theresults from alteration and the hashing of the identificationinformation by a credential broker may ensure that the legitimatecitizen maintained complete control over the release of their criminalbackground check results.

Yet another exemplary use of the present disclosure may be with bankingand/or sharing economy applications. Banks may need to comply with KnowYour Customer (“KYC”), Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”), and/or Office ofForeign Assets Control (“OFAC”) regulations. Sharing economy apps, suchas Uber and AirBnB, may also need to verify the identity and criminalhistory of their suppliers (though requirements differ from city to cityand state to state for sharing economy). The present disclosure asdescribed above and below, may lower the risk of fraud to theseindustries, particularly as the number of identities registered via thecredential broker increases.

FIG. 1 depicts a networked environment 100 for online authentication ofa user 102 utilizing a credential broker, according to an embodiment ofthe present disclosure. The networked environment 100 includes relyingparty systems 110 that may request authentication of an online identityand/or credentials of a user 102, identity provider systems 104 and 108that may authenticate the online identity and/or credential, acredential broker 106 that may provide secure online credentialauthentication for an identity provider, verification data sourcesystems 112, which may verify identification information of the user 102for the identity providers 104, 108 and which may provide data toauthenticate an online identity and/or credential.

A user to be authenticated may be directed to the identity providersystem 104 of the identity provider by a relying party system 110 of arelying party. The assurance level (“AL”) required by the relying partyfor an online transaction conducted for relying party system 110 may beprovided in an authentication request from the relying party.Alternatively, and/or additionally, the AL may be determined by theidentity provider system 104 by reviewing the authentication requestfrom relying party system 110 and/or determined by the credential broker106. For example, the identity provider system 104 may determine an ALneeded by examining an authentication request for a user from relyingparty system 110, and cross-referencing the authentication request withone or more predetermined policies associated with the relying party.Alternatively, and/or additionally, the identity provider system 104and/or credential broker 106 may examine an authentication request for auser 102 from relying party system 110, and may cross-reference theauthentication request with one or more previous authentication requestsfrom the relying party and/or identity provider to determine an ALneeded.

In an exemplary embodiment, the user 102 may visit a government agencywebsite (i.e., a relying party system 110 website). The governmentagency website (relying party system 110 website) may request the user102 login (authentication request) using login information of a bank(i.e., an identity provider 104).

A user 102 may login with the bank (identity provider system 104) viathe government agency website (relying party system 110 website). Thebank system (identity provider system 104) may determine whichidentification information of the user 102 may be needed forauthentication to a predetermined AL. In an alternative embodiment, uponlogging in, the user 102 may be directed to the credential broker system106. The credential broker system 106 may determine that the user 102should be routed to the bank system (identity provider system 104) forauthentication to a predetermined AL.

The bank system (identity provider system 104) may transmitidentification information to the credential broker 106 for secureonline authentication of the credential that may meet the predeterminedassurance level. In an alternative embodiment, the bank system (identityprovider system 104), prior to transmitting identification information,may request permission from user 102 to transmit identificationinformation to the credential broker system 106 via the governmentagency website (relying party system 110).

The credential broker 106 may receive identification information fromthe bank system (identity provider system 104). In one embodiment, ifthe identification information is encrypted, the credential broker 106may decrypt the identification information. Upon receiving and/ordecrypting the identification information, the credential broker 106 mayhash the identification information using a hash function. Upon hashingthe identification information, the credential broker 106 may deleteand/or remove the received identification information of the user 102.The hash of the identification information may then be stored inassociation with the identity provider system that transmitted theidentification information. The identification information may be hashedto prevent the storage of personal information in a database, and toensure that the identification information is stored in a way that ismeaningless to an identity thief.

In an alternative embodiment, the bank system (identity provider system104) may hash the identification information, and may transmit thehashed identification information. Additionally, the bank system(identity provider system 104) may encrypt the hashed identificationinformation prior to transmitting the hashed identification informationto the credential broker 106.

In one embodiment, all of the identification information may be used toproduce a hash. In an alternative embodiment, a portion of theidentification information may be used to produce a hash. In yet anotherembodiment, multiple hashes may be produced, each hash using differentportions of the identification information to produce the hash. Forexample, an individual may change his or her first and/or last name.Thus, multiple hashes may be produced, a first has may be hashes of theindividual's first name, social security number, address, a second hashmay be hashes of the individual's last name, phone number, and date ofbirth, a third hash may be hashes of the individual's social securitynumber, date of birth, and address, etc. Accordingly, if one match, asdiscussed below, fails (such as the case where the last name haschanged), then another hash may be used to resolve the individual to aunique identity.

Upon receiving the hashed identification information, the credentialbroker 106 may compare the hashed identification information withpreviously stored hashed identification information in a hash database106A of the credential broker 106. If the hashed identificationinformation does not match any previously stored hashed identificationinformation, the credential broker 106 may store the hashedidentification information and the identity provider transmitting theidentification information in the hash database 106A. The credentialbroker may then transmit an authentication result to the governmentagency website (relying party system 110 website) via the banking system(identity provider system 104). In one embodiment, the authenticationresult may indicate that the user 102 is a new user. The authenticationresult may be encrypted by the credential broker 106 prior totransmission.

If the hashed identification information matches a previously storedhashed identification information, the credential broker 106 may comparethe banking system (identity provider system 104) that sent theidentification information to a previous identity provider system storedin association with the previously stored hashed identificationinformation. If the current identity provider 104 (banking system)matches the previous identity provider, then the credential broker 106may transmit an authentication result to a relying party. In oneembodiment, the authentication result may indicate that the user 102 isan existing user. The authentication result may be encrypted by thecredential broker 106 prior to transmission.

If the hashed identification information matches a previously storedhashed identification information and the current banking system(identity provider system 104) does not match the previous identityprovider (identity provider system 108), then the user 102 mayauthenticate their identity with the previous identity provider 108.Alternatively, if the hashed identification information matches apreviously stored hashed identification information and the currentidentity provider does not match the previous identity provider, thenthe user 102 may be notified to authenticate their identity with theprevious identity provider 108.

FIG. 2 depicts a flow diagram 200 providing a method in which onlineidentities and/or credentials may be authenticated through a credentialbroker 106, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. Asshown in flow diagram 200, systems of various parties may be accessedand/or communicate in the process of authenticating an online identityand/or credential of a user through a credential broker. Flow diagram200 of FIG. 2 includes a user system 210, a relying party (“RP”) system220, an identity provider system 230, a verification data source system240, a credential broker system 250, and another identity providersystem 260.

Authentication may begin by user system 210 visiting a website and/orapplication of relying party system 220, as shown by step A.Alternatively, authentication may begin by user system 210 logging intoa website and/or application of the identity provider system 230. Therelying party system 220 at step B may then provide an authenticationrequest to the identity provider system 230. For example, theauthentication request may request authentication of an online identityand/or credential of a user.

Identity provider system 230 may then determine what assurance level isneeded by the authentication request at step C1. Alternatively, identityprovider system 230 may direct the authentication request to credentialbroker system 250 at step C2. Then, credential broker system 250 at stepD may determine what AL is needed by the authentication request. Thecredential broker system 250 may then transmit the AL needed for theauthentication request to identity provider system 230 at step E.

Identity provider system 230 may determine identification informationneeded for the AL required at F. If the identity provider system 230does not have the identification information needed for the AL required,then the identity provider system 230 may collect identificationinformation from the user via the relying party system 220 at step G.Identity provider system 230 may verify the collected identificationinformation by transmitting it to verification data source system 240for verification and receiving a result at step H.

The identification information may then be transmitted to the usersystem 102 via the relying party system 220 to obtain consent from theuser to transmit to credential broker 250 at step I. Upon receivingconsent, the identity provider system 230 may transmit theidentification information to credential broker system 250 at step J1.Alternatively, the identity provider system 230 may hash theidentification information using a hashing function, and transmit thehashed identification information to credential broker system 250 atstep J2. The identification information and the hashed identificationinformation may optionally be encrypted prior to transmitting theidentification information and hashed identification information to thecredential broker system 250.

The credential broker system 250 may receive the identificationinformation at step K. If the identification information is encrypted,the credential broker system 250 may decrypt the identificationinformation. If the identification information is hashed, the methodproceeds to step N.

If the identification information is not hashed, the credential brokersystem 250 may hash the identification information using a hashingfunction at step L. Then the credential broker system 250 may delete(remove) the identification information at step M. At step N, thecredential broker system 250 may compare the hashed identificationinformation with previously stored hashed identification information ina hash database 106A of the credential broker system 250. If the hashedidentification information does not match any previously stored hashedidentification information, then the credential broker system 250 maystore the hashed identification information and the identity providersystem 230 transmitting the identification information in the hashdatabase at step O1. The credential broker system 250 may transmit anauthentication result to the relying party system 220 via the identityprovider system 230 at step P. The authentication result may beencrypted by the credential broker system 250 prior to transmission.

If the hashed identification information matches a previously storedhashed identification information, the credential broker system at stepO2 may compare the identity provider system 230 that sent theidentification information to a previous identity provider system storedin association with the previously stored hashed identificationinformation. If the current identity provider system 230 matches theprevious identity provider, then the credential broker system 250 maytransmit an authentication result to the relying party system 220 viathe identity provider system 230 at step P. The authentication resultmay be encrypted by the credential broker system 250 prior totransmission.

If the hashed identification information matches a previously storedhashed identification information and the identity provider system 230does not match the previous identity provider system, such as identityprovider system 260, then the user system 210 may authenticate acredential of the user with the identity provider system 260 via thecredential broker system 250 at step Q. If the user system 210authenticates their identity with credential broker system 250 viaidentity provider system 260, then an authentication result may betransmitted by credential broker system 250 to the relying party system220 via the identity provider system 230 at step R.

FIG. 3 depicts a flow diagram 300 providing a method for secure onlinecredential authentication, according to one embodiment of the presentdisclosure. The method may begin at step 302 in which a credentialprovider may receive, over an electronic network, identificationinformation from an identity provider. At step 304, the credentialprovider may hash the received identification information from theidentity provider by utilizing a hashing function to produce hashedidentification information. After the identification information hasbeen hashed, the credential broker may delete (remove) the receivedidentification information from the identity provider at step 306. Inone embodiment, a portion of identification information may be deleted(removed).

The credential broker may access a database in which previously hashedidentification information is stored in association with a previousidentity provider. Then, at step 308, the credential broker may comparethe hashed identification information to previously stored hashedidentification information. When the hashed identification informationdoes not match previously stored hashed identification information, thecredential broker may store the hashed identification information inassociation with the identity provider that provided the identificationinformation in the database at step 310.

At some time after storing the hashed identification information inassociation with the identity provider, the credential broker mayreceive, over an electronic network, identification information from anidentity provider at step 312. The credential broker may hash thereceived identification information from the identity provider byutilizing a hashing function to produce hashed identificationinformation at step 314. After the identification information has beenhashed, the credential broker may delete (remove) the receivedidentification information from the identity provider at step 316.

The credential broker may access a database in which previously hashedidentification information is stored in association with a previousidentity provider. Then, at step 318, the credential broker may comparethe hashed identification information to previously stored hashedidentification information. When the hashed identification informationmatches previously stored hashed identification information, thecredential broker may compare the identity provider that provided theidentification information to previously stored identity providersstored in association with the previously stored hashed identificationinformation at step 320.

A log of all relevant transactions may be maintained though one or bothof an automated logging system and/or a manual logging system for apredetermined time period. Transaction logs may be retained andprotected against unauthorized access, loss, and/or corruption.Additionally, transaction logs may be used to support audit functionsand any investigative processes. In one embodiment, a credential brokermay not maintain transaction logs. In another embodiment, a credentialbroker may only maintain hashed identification information associatedwith the identity provider that provided the identification information.

Event logs may include one or more of an event serial number and/orsequence number that provides a unique reference for the event; a dateand time of the event; a description of the event; any users, persons,devices, applications, networks and/or operating systems associated withthe event; and/or other pertinent information, as discussed below.

Systems of the identity provider and/or credential broker may be housedin secure data centers. The secure data centers may be located atgeographical alternate sites, and may include multi-layer physicalsecurity. Use of such data centers allows for the minimization ofopportunities for unauthorized access, disclosure, loss, and/orcorruption of sensitive and system information, and of IT resources uponwhich the service is dependent. The location and construction, whencombined with other physical security protection mechanisms, such asguards and intrusion sensors, may provide robust protection againstunauthorized access to the identity provider's and/or credentialbroker's equipment and records and protection from adverse environmentalconditions.

If the identity provider and/or credential broker uses third-partyhosting, the ability of the identity provider and/or credential brokerto provide facilities that meet the above-described securityconsiderations may be determined either by a physical inspection by theauthentication party and/or through review of independent analyses andaudits of the facilities.

The identity provider and/or credential broker may also use developmentfacilities, which do not process real user data, may also be protectedby multi-layer physical security, minimizing the opportunities forunauthorized access, disclosure, loss, and/or corruption of sensitiveand system information, and of IT resources on which development isdependent. The identity provider and/or credential broker may also useback-up and/or disaster-recovery sites including the same level ofprotection. A reduced level of security may be permissible to the extentthat no real user data is stored. Security may be sufficient to ensurethat the sensitivity of proprietary information and the ability tosupport the production system is not compromised.

The identity provider and/or credential broker may also allowinformation and media to be transported between sites. Sensitiveinformation and IT resources in the custody of staff of an identityprovider and/or credential broker may be protected from unauthorizedaccess, disclosure, loss, and/or corruption by having special proceduresfor use and potential storage in public areas, such as hotels,restaurants, car parks. Further, any back-up and/or disaster-recoverysites may have the same special procedures for the same level ofprotection.

In the event that the identity provider and/or credential broker hassensitive information to be disposed of, such as unhashed identificationinformation received by the credential broker, disposal methods may meetor exceed the requirements and/or policies of various standard settingbodies, including the Department of Defense (“DOD”) and/or NationalInstitute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”), in order to ensure thattechniques applied match the storage media technology in use. Whenthird-party services are used, those entities may be required toguarantee and take responsibility for observing or exceeding those samerequirements and/or policies.

Communications between components of the identity provider and/orcredential broker and outside of a common demilitarized zone (“DMZ”) maybe encrypted and/or mutually-authenticated using protocols that meetand/or exceed recognized best practices for a threat scenario used by arisk assessment process. Risk assessments may analyze threats including,but not limited to, password guessing; message replay; eavesdropping;introduction of malicious code; compromised authentication arising frominsider action; out-of-band attacks by users, system operators, and/orthird-parties; spoofing of system elements and/or applications;malfeasance on the part of a user; and/or intrusions leading toinformation theft.

Each transaction may be protected by end-to-end encryption, such thatall data transfers are secured. Additionally, full-time automatedmonitoring and test script execution may be provided with automatednotification to operational personnel. Further, daily system managementreports may be produced, reviewed, and/or protectively stored. Systemmanagement reports may include security events, transactions processed,system usage and/or capacity, and/or system availability.

The identity provider and/or credential broker may employ anidentity-based key management architecture. Keys may be assigned keynames (identities) and the assigned key names may be used to referencethe appropriate key. The key naming model may be used with anidentity-based encryption, in which the key name may be mathematicallyconverted into a public key, as well as with symmetric encryptionalgorithms, such as format-preserving encryption (“FPE”), and advancedencryption standards (“AES”), in which the key name may be used toderive a symmetric key.

Initially, an identity provider and/or credential broker base key may begenerated. A separate base key may also be generated for each encryptionalgorithm. The identity-based encryption (“IBE”) base key may bemaintained as a master secret. Further, a one-time backup of the one ormore IBE base keys may be performed in order to provide for disasterrecovery.

When a key is requested from a Key Management System (“KMS”), the keyname may be used to generate the actual keying material, i.e., thesymmetric key in the case of symmetric encryption algorithms, such asFPE, AES, and/or triple data encryption standard (“3DES”), and theprivate key, in the case of IBE. After the requesting entity has beenappropriately authenticated, the KMS may use a Key Derivation Function(“KDF”) to combine the base key and the key name, producing the actualkeying material.

This derived-key approach enables the KMS of an identity provider and/orcredential broker to be stateless, which allows individual encryptionkeys to be generated on-demand from a base key. The ability to derivekeys may be deployed in a highly distributed environment without theneed to continuously replicate keys across servers. For example, if akey is required for disaster recovery or audit purposes, the key may beregenerated.

Keys may have a predetermined lifecycle when used to encrypt data, andmay be refreshed on a predetermined schedule. The KMS of the identityprovider and/or credential broker may incorporate a key expiration andderivation system that allows complete management of a key lifecycle.Keys provided by the identity provider and/or credential broker mayinclude an inherent time reference that determines when the key is to beautomatically cycled. Additionally, keys may reference distinct basekeys, which allows for a procedure-based key refresh.

Any of the systems, servers, modules, and/or devices, discussed abovemay include any type or combination of computing systems, such ashandheld devices, personal computers, servers, clustered computingmachines, and/or cloud computing systems. In one embodiment, theabove-described systems, servers, modules, and devices may be anassembly of hardware, including a memory, a central processing unit(“CPU”), and/or optionally a user interface. The memory may include anytype of RAM or ROM embodied in a physical storage medium, such asmagnetic storage including floppy disk, hard disk, or magnetic tape;semiconductor storage such as solid state disk (“SSD”) or flash memory;optical disc storage; or magneto-optical disc storage. The CPU mayinclude one or more processors for processing data according toinstructions stored in the memory. The functions of the processor may beprovided by a single dedicated processor or by a plurality ofprocessors. Moreover, the processor may include, without limitation,digital signal processor (“DSP”) hardware, or any other hardware capableof executing software. The user interface may include any type orcombination of input/output devices, such as a display monitor,touchpad, touchscreen, microphone, camera, keyboard, and/or mouse.

FIG. 4 is a simplified functional block diagram of a computer that maybe configured as a device or server for executing the methods,procedures, policies, and/or calculation discussed in reference to FIGS.1-3, according to exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.Specifically, in one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, any of theabove-described systems, servers, modules, and/or devices may be anassembly of hardware 400 including, for example, a data communicationinterface 460 for packet data communication. The platform may alsoinclude a CPU 420, in the form of one or more processors, for executingprogram instructions. The platform typically includes an internalcommunication bus 410, program storage, and data storage for variousdata files to be processed and/or communicated by the platform such asROM 430 and RAM 440, although the system 400 often receives programmingand data via network communications 470. The server 400 also may includeinput and output ports 450 to connect with input and output devices suchas keyboards, mice, touchscreens, monitors, displays, etc. Of course,the various server functions may be implemented in a distributed fashionon a number of similar platforms, to distribute the processing load.Alternatively, the servers may be implemented by appropriate programmingof one computer hardware platform.

Program aspects of the technology may be thought of as “products” or“articles of manufacture” typically in the form of executable codeand/or associated data that is carried on or embodied in a type ofmachine readable medium. “Storage” type media include any or all of thetangible memory of the computers, processors or the like, or associatedmodules thereof, such as various semiconductor memories, tape drives,disk drives and the like, which may provide non-transitory storage atany time for the software programming. All or portions of the softwaremay at times be communicated through the Internet or various othertelecommunication networks. Such communications, for example, may enableloading of the software from one computer or processor into another, forexample, from a management server or host computer of the mobilecommunication network into the computer platform of a server and/or froma server to the mobile device. Thus, another type of media that may bearthe software elements includes optical, electrical and electromagneticwaves, which may be used across physical interfaces between localdevices, through wired and optical landline networks and over variousair-links. The physical elements that carry such waves, such as wired orwireless links, optical links, or the like, also may be considered asmedia bearing the software. As used herein, unless restricted tonon-transitory, tangible “storage” media, terms such as computer ormachine “readable medium” refer to any medium that participates inproviding instructions to a processor for execution.

While the presently disclosed sharing application, methods, devices, andsystems are described with exemplary reference to applications and totransmitting data, it should be appreciated that the presently disclosedembodiments may be applicable to any environment, such as a desktop orlaptop computer, an automobile entertainment system, a homeentertainment system, etc. Also, the presently disclosed embodiments maybe applicable to any type of Internet protocol.

Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled inthe art from consideration of the specification and practice of theinvention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification andexamples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spiritof the invention being indicated by the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method for secure onlinecredential authentication, the method including: receiving, at a server,first identification information from a first identity provider, whereinthe first identification information includes at least a first portionof the first identification information; based on receiving the firstidentification information from the first identity provider, hashing, bythe server, the at least first portion of the first identificationinformation by a hashing function to produce a first hashed portion ofthe first identification information; accessing, by the server from adatabase, previously stored hashed identification information stored asa hash in association with a previous identity provider; comparing, bythe server, the first hashed portion of the first identificationinformation as a hash to the previously stored hashed identificationinformation as a hash; and storing, by the server, the first hashedportion of the first identification information as a hash in associationwith the first identity provider that provided the first identificationinformation in the database when the first hashed portion of the firstidentification information as a hash does not match the previouslystored hashed identification information as a hash.
 2. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising: receiving, at the server, secondidentification information from a second identity provider; accessing,by the server from the database, previously stored hashed identificationinformation stored in association with a previous identity provider;comparing, by the server, the second identification information topreviously stored hashed identification information; and comparing, bythe server, the second identity provider that provided the secondidentification information to previously stored identity provider storedin association with the previously stored hashed identificationinformation when the second identification information matchespreviously stored hashed identification information.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein receiving the first identification information from thefirst identity provider includes: receiving, at the server, previouslyhashed identification information from the first identity provider. 4.The method of claim 2, wherein receiving the second identificationinformation from the second identity provider includes: receiving, atthe server, the second identification information from the secondidentity provider, wherein the second identification includes at least afirst portion of the second identification information; based onreceiving the second identification information from the second identityprovider, hashing, by the server, the at least first portion of thesecond identification information by a hashing function to produce afirst hashed portion of the second identification information; anddeleting, by the server, the second identification information receivingfrom the second identity provider.
 5. The method of claim 2, whereinreceiving the second identification information from the second identityprovider includes: receiving, at the server, hashed secondidentification information from the second identity provider.
 6. Themethod of claim 2, further comprising: transmitting, by the server, apositive authentication result when the second identificationinformation matches previously stored hashed identification information,and when the second identity provider matches the previously storedidentity provider stored in association with the previously storedhashed identification information.
 7. The method of claim 1, whereinreceiving the first identification information from the first identityprovider includes: receiving, at the server, first identificationinformation from the first identity provider, wherein the firstidentification information includes at least a first portion of thefirst identification information and a second portion of the firstidentification information.
 8. A system for secure online credentialauthentication, the system including: a data storage device that storesinstructions system for secure online credential authentication; and aprocessor configured to execute the instructions to perform a methodincluding: receiving, at a server, first identification information froma first identity provider, wherein the first identification informationincludes at least a first portion of the first identificationinformation; based on receiving the first identification informationfrom the first identity provider, hashing, by the server, the at leastfirst portion of the first identification information by a hashingfunction to produce a first hashed portion of the first identificationinformation; accessing, by the server from a database, previously storedhashed identification information stored as a hash in association with aprevious identity provider; comparing, by the server, the first hashedportion of the first identification information as a hash to thepreviously stored hashed identification information as a hash; andstoring, by the server, the first hashed portion of the firstidentification information as a hash in association with the firstidentity provider that provided the first identification information inthe database when the first hashed portion of the first identificationinformation as a hash does not match the previously stored hashedidentification information as a hash.
 9. The system according to claim8, wherein the processor is further configured to execute theinstructions to perform the method including: receiving, at the server,second identification information from a second identity provider;accessing, by the server from the database, previously stored hashedidentification information stored in association with a previousidentity provider; comparing, by the server, the second identificationinformation to previously stored hashed identification information; andcomparing, by the server, the second identity provider that provided thesecond identification information to previously stored identity providerstored in association with the previously stored hashed identificationinformation when the second identification information matchespreviously stored hashed identification information.
 10. The system ofclaim 8, wherein receiving the first identification information from thefirst identity provider includes: receiving, at the server, previouslyhashed identification information from the first identity provider. 11.The system of claim 9, wherein receiving the second identificationinformation from the second identity provider includes: receiving, atthe server, the second identification information from the secondidentity provider, wherein the second identification includes at least afirst portion of the second identification information; based onreceiving the second identification information from the second identityprovider, hashing, by the server, the at least first portion of thesecond identification information by a hashing function to produce afirst hashed portion of the second identification information; anddeleting, by the server, the second identification information receivingfrom the second identity provider.
 12. The system of claim 9, whereinreceiving the second identification information from the second identityprovider includes: receiving, at the server, hashed secondidentification information from the second identity provider.
 13. Thesystem of claim 9, further comprising: transmitting, by the server, apositive authentication result when the second identificationinformation matches previously stored hashed identification information,and when the second identity provider matches the previously storedidentity provider stored in association with the previously storedhashed identification information.
 14. The system of claim 9, whereinreceiving the first identification information from the first identityprovider includes: receiving, at the server, first identificationinformation from the first identity provider, wherein the firstidentification information includes at least a first portion of thefirst identification information and a second portion of the firstidentification information.
 15. A non-transitory computer-readablemedium storing instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause thecomputer to perform a method for secure online credentialauthentication, the method including: receiving, at a server, firstidentification information from a first identity provider, wherein thefirst identification information includes at least a first portion ofthe first identification information; based on receiving the firstidentification information from the first identity provider, hashing, bythe server, the at least first portion of the first identificationinformation by a hashing function to produce a first hashed portion ofthe first identification information; accessing, by the server from adatabase, previously stored hashed identification information stored asa hash in association with a previous identity provider; comparing, bythe server, the first hashed portion of the first identificationinformation as a hash to the previously stored hashed identificationinformation as a hash; and storing, by the server, the first hashedportion of the first identification information as a hash in associationwith the first identity provider that provided the first identificationinformation in the database when the first hashed portion of the firstidentification information as a hash does not match the previouslystored hashed identification information as a hash.
 16. Thecomputer-readable medium according to claim 15, further comprising:receiving, at the server, second identification information from asecond identity provider; accessing, by the server from the database,previously stored hashed identification information stored inassociation with a previous identity provider; comparing, by the server,the second identification information to previously stored hashedidentification information; and comparing, by the server, the secondidentity provider that provided the second identification information topreviously stored identity provider stored in association with thepreviously stored hashed identification information when the secondidentification information matches previously stored hashedidentification information.
 17. The computer-readable medium accordingto claim 15, wherein receiving the first identification information fromthe first identity provider includes: receiving, at the server,previously hashed identification information from the first identityprovider.
 18. The computer-readable medium according to claim 16,wherein receiving the second identification information from the secondidentity provider includes: receiving, at the server, the secondidentification information from the second identity provider, whereinthe second identification includes at least a first portion of thesecond identification information; based on receiving the secondidentification information from the second identity provider, hashing,by the server, the at least first portion of the second identificationinformation by a hashing function to produce a first hashed portion ofthe second identification information; and deleting, by the server, thesecond identification information receiving from the second identityprovider.
 19. The computer-readable medium according to claim 16,further comprising: transmitting, by the server, a positiveauthentication result when the second identification information matchespreviously stored hashed identification information, and when the secondidentity provider matches the previously stored identity provider storedin association with the previously stored hashed identificationinformation.
 20. The computer-readable medium according to claim 15,wherein receiving the first identification information from the firstidentity provider includes: receiving, at the server, firstidentification information from the first identity provider, wherein thefirst identification information includes at least a first portion ofthe first identification information and a second portion of the firstidentification information.